In The Catbird Seat, James Thurber tells the report in a bureau that encourages the reader to take the side of the villain. Normally, the victim of a presumption circumstance is the person who is wronged. However, this particular story makes the reader rate Mr. Martins character, agreeing with the idea that Ulgine Barrows must, at all costs, disappear. Although it is Martin who is deceiving in the end, the reader ultimately feels relieved to see him thinking fast and turning the carry over when unusual situations arise. Thurbers careful use of language, along with the imaginary control board trial, convinces readers that Martins Murder plan is justified.
Thurbers choice of wording throughout the story persuades the reader away from having any sympathy for Ulgine Barrows. As in short as the first encounter between Martin and Ulgine is identifyed, the reader at one time gets a feeling of annoyance for Ulgine: He had given her his ironic hand, a look of studious concentration, and a faint smile. Well, she had said, flavor at the papers on his desk, are you lifting the oxcart out of the ditch?(pg. 368) She does not appear to be trying very hard to reveal friendly qualities, only criticism toward a man that she is encounter for the first time.
Another way that Thurber makes Ulgine appear less sympathetic is the descriptive way that her words are told: Her quacking voice and braying laugh had first profaned the halls of F&S on March 7, 1941...(pg.368).
With the use of the imaginary jury trial, Thurber keeps the reader positive(p) that Barrows is a bad person with nothing but the or so unkind intentions: A gavel rapped in Mr. Martins mind and the case halal was resumed. Mrs. Ulgine Barrows stood charged with willful, blatant, and persistent attempts to destroy the efficiency...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper