California - High Tech

Hi-Technologies in calciumThe article Hi-Tech Voting Is Banned in atomic number 20 by John Schwarz discusses reasons and arguments why it is better to relegate high-tech voting systems in California . The article presents both(prenominal) arguments of proponents and opponents of the controversial egression . Schwarz reports that practice session of about 1 ,500 electronic voting machines designed by Diebold is banned in California because of aims about system insecurity and improper operation . They win t be used till measures to upgrade systems atomic number 18 taken . therefore , Diebold should be charged because of fraudulent actions , as intimately as of despicable behavior . The company is claimed to engage unsubstantial behavior to succeed in California business sphereThe issue whether to use electronic voting systems has become controversial and is salvage under debate . On the one hand , opponents claim that systems should be banned as they are insecure allowing hacking during the electoral movement which is impossible . Insecure systems make electoral process less transparent and the losing side will get a chance to dispute results of elections . Moreover , credible reputation of California will be also under attack . Opponents beseech that fraud and electoral flaws may remain undetected and , in such a way re-counting won t take beam . Credibility of results will be doubtfulThe director of marketing in Diebold doesn t agree with accusations Mark Radke argues that they are confident in their technologies and benefits . whence , they are going to check everything to help successful elections in California . The California secretary of state Mr . Shelley , says that the company has jeopardized the subject of the elections as thousand of voters in San Diego were not provided with opportunity to consider polling dwelling houses because of malfunctioning of electronic voting systems .

The president of Diebold defends his company claiming they are not idiots , although he admits that their systems may sprains not as the smartest from time to time , as they are not Gods and , Diebold is accused of breaking law of state elections as they select installed insecure software on machines . Moreover , it is revealed that the company has installed software which is not tested at the federal level . Therefore , machines known as AccuVote TSX are banned from usingActually , AccuVote TSC were uses in Solano , furnish , San Diego and San Joaquin counties . Now they have to use older technologies - optical voter turnout scanning - and voters must mark ballots by hand . It is recommended to use touch-screen voting machines in elections till verification process takes place . However , these systems will be also banned of counties bear t upgrade their reliability and security . Mr Shelley reports that machines in ten counties are closed explaining that such steps are necessary . The remainder is assumed to balance trying to make this election work in those 10 counties with improving voter confidence (p .13Mr . Shelley asked hi-tech voting machines to produce a receipt and claims for seeking unseasoned ways how to speed up preparation for elections Schwarz writes that the number of opponents is emergence . For example , a voters group...If you want to get a in effect(p) essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper