Supreme Court Exercise

In January of 1997 , the standing chair , William Jefferson Clinton sued a adult womanish named Paula Corbin Jones . Jones had claimed that the chairman , while governor , had made unwanted , thence , salacious sexual advances toward her and that her refusal to comply with Clinton s wishes had resulted in hardship at excogitate for her (USSC , 1997 . Jones claimed she had been working at the front desk of a hotel with a nonher woman , when Clinton arrived for a visit . She and a co-worker had chatted with Clinton s accompaniment for a few moments . Clinton , observing the br conversation , remarked to his accompaniment that Jones had a come hither look , and he instructed Ferguson to exact Jones up to talk to him . Jones testified that she had joined Clinton in his room , hoping for a contemplate promotion . Clinton instead made sexual advances toward her , which she repeatedly refused . Jones claimed that Clinton had then(prenominal) told her to be smart and non make trouble , because he knew her boss (AP , 1998Clinton , rather than responding to these charges , d a motion to produce the charges , citing hot seatial claim . Clinton s honoryer Robert Bennett claimed that Jones would non lose both rights if her claim was postponed , and that , indeed , she might earn interest on any damages she was awarded (Johnston , 1994 . A district judge denied Clinton s play up for dismissal , but govern that probes and trials into Clinton s behavior could be deferred until later his term as President was up (USSC , 1997The ogdoad zone Court of Appeals likewise ruled that Clinton s motion for subway system ought not be granted , but it found that deferring the investigation gave Clinton fugitive immunity that he was not entirely authorise to . The approach reasoned that the president was no t above the law , rather , he was subject to! the same rules as unexceptional citizens .

turn the president was allowed immunity from charges against his official acts , he could motionlessness , state the administration , be held accountable for unofficial acts . His close comport , according to the Eigth District Court , could be held below interrogatory (USSC , 1997The court , in Clinton v . Jones addressed several(prenominal) inherent questions , but dismissed two . One was whether or not a similar claim to Clinton s would be no-hit on the state level . The gage was whether or not the court had the power to demand the president s presence at any time . Th e court did address three constitutional questions , so far . The initiatory was whether or not the president had the right to immunity in affairs not think to his official clientele . The court did not find it obligatory to answer the first two questions , but did find that the president s immunity did not extend to his private conduct (USSC , 1997 The second was whether or not the court finding that the president did not have immunity in such cases violated the time interval of powers . The court ruled that it did not . The third was whether or not the court , by submitting Clinton to investigations , might...If you want to get a honest essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper