In The Crucible, John Procter gives his life sentence to defend his concept of justice and truth. Two and a one-half centuries later, Edward R. Murrow went against Joseph McCarthy to defend democracy and truth, which he felt were being threatened, risking his video recording show and career in the process.
One could say that these cardinal individuals were foolish in the risks that they took, especially considering that there was no warranty that their fight would be won. Both individuals could easily have gone(a) on with their lives and careers without having to jeopardize any social occasion. But they made the sacrifice and chose to do so anyways.
What these men did was dangerous, but their actions were not in mineral vein because it is necessary to defend liberty and truth when they are down the stairs siege. If people like Procter did not stand up for what they believed in, much people would have ended up being hanged or burned alive. If people like Edward R. Murrow did not fight against McCarthyism, the united States could be a very different place today.
thither is no unworthy cause, and it is always respectable to stand up for what you believe in, no matter what the consequences may be. In the dread scheme of things, even if at the time your actions are unsuccessful, a lot times it turns out that future generations look back on your noble stand for what you believe in and draw intake from it, despite the fact that it was unsuccessful.
Therefore, there is no such thing as a hopeless cause, and the risks are worth winning in order to protect what you believe in. Even if you crumple in your attempt, the fact that you fought in the first place is sometimes the most valiant display of courage there is.If you fate to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment