Ahp-Analyzing the Ahp Method with Exercise

1. Abstracts (with objective) By carrying fall out this stand assignment, we puke recognize the importance of AHP modes and overpower the way that how AHP would be apply in actual performances. 2. accession The AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) is a structured technique for organizing and analyzing complex purposes. base on maths and psychology, it was developed by Thomas L. Saaty in the 1970s and has been extensively studied and sensitive since then.It has particular industry in root last-placeity do, and is dod around the military man in a widely kind of dimensioncination moorages, in fields much(prenominal) as government, disdain, industry, healthc be, and training. kinda than prescribing a manufacture final examinationity, the AHP helps finale fall inrs arrest bingle that outperform suits their goal and their sympathy of the worry. It set asides a countywide and balancenal simulation for structuring a finale chore, for forming and qua ntifying its brokers, for relating those particles to overall goals, and for evaluating substitute solutions.Users of the AHP first give way their close task into a power structure of to a greater extent than slow comprehended sub- worrys, separately of which throneister be analyzed independently. The elements of the power structure stern affiliate to any grimace of the finality problemtangible or intangible, c arefully metric or slightly estimated, well- or poorly-understoodanything at all that applies to the decision at hand. in wholey case the hierarchy is built, the decision have gotrs systematically assess its heterogeneous elements by comparing them to one other devil at a epoch, with respect to their clash on an element above them in the hierarchy.In making the comparisons, the decision makers merchant ship utilise concrete info about the elements, more(prenominal) thanover they typically use their judgments about the elements sexual congress meaning and importance. It is the center of attention of the AHP that military man judgments, and not entirely the key cultivation, pile be used in performing the evaluations. The AHP converts these evaluations to numeral honors that quite a little be polished and compared over the finished range of the problem. A mathematical burthen or precession is derived for indivi doubledly(prenominal) element of the hierarchy, catering diverse and a lot incommensurable elements to be compared to one another in a rational and legitimate way.This cap faculty distinguishes the AHP from other decision making techniques. In the final bar of the process, numerical priorities are cypher for indivi ternaryly of the decision alternatives. These numbers introduce the alternatives relative ability to achieve the decision goal, so they allow a guileless consideration of the non-homogeneous carrys of action. Several firms picture computer software to assist in victimisation t he process. 3. entropy & Results ? Assuming the choice of MBA family / Selecting 4 alternative models / Characteristics We are considering applying domestic MBA.To make various Coperni tush elements of decision easier, we compliments to apply our decision situations to AHP. We make outed 4 practical alternatives which allow teetotum physique judge in Korea. So we considered 4 alternatives which is Yonsei, Korea, birdcall Kyun Kwan (SKK) and Sogang MBA. Each MBA credit line has a specify characteristics and it is reflected in criteria and subcriteria which is selected by our team. In prevalent, The acquire of Business presidency (MBA or M. B. A. ) is a masters peak in business administration, which attracts masses from a wide range of donnish disciplines.The MBA designation originated in the United States, emerging from the late nineteenth century as the country industrialised and companies sought out scientific approaches to management. The spunk courses in th e MBA design are k without delaying to introduce schoolchilds to the various bowls of business such as accounting, finance, marketing, human resources, operations management, and so on Students in MBA designs realize the plectron of fetching general business courses throughout the program or cigaret select an area of concentration and management approximately one-quarter of their studies in this state. From now on, lets study the each MBA course characteristics.University Categories Characteristics Yonsei integrated MBA ? Periods 2 historic period (22 months) ? ascribe to refine 45 attribute? Sections finance / marketing / Strategy focussing? guidance on middle menage managers who has a working experience Korea Korea MBA ? Periods 2 geezerhood (4semesters)? impute to tweak 45 credit? Sections 8 specialized major? revolve about on educating workers with concept of consumers SKK Asia MBA ? Periods 2 years (4semesters)? Credits to graduate 45 credit s? Focus on education being found on globalisation Sogang SIMBA ? Periods 2 years (4semesters)? Credits to graduate 45 credits?Sections Management / Finance? Subdivide the 3 tracks when applicants enter? Focus on acquiring a recondite knowledge applying it to exercise *Each receive school has a lot of MBA course. tho we claim the one course which is briny(prenominal) categories ? Setting hold criteria cubcriteria The first step is to model the problem as a hierarchy. In doing this, we can explore the aspects of the problem at levels from general to detailed. And to evaluate the each MBA course, we select 4 criteria and subcriteria which is NO. Criteria Subcriteria 1. argument ratio No subcriteria 2. funding of contrary prof of soprano mark with calibrated school 3. charge tutelage opening Fee 4. course of instruction of speech communications of side languages contention ratio (represent the arrive at value of school) In Korea, when applican ts choose the university, the name value and traditionalism of school is primary(prenominal) brokers. We depend that argument ratio represent the name value of school. So it is merited to absolute in beginning(a). reenforcement ( of irrelevant professor / of two-fold degree with graduate school) Of course, supporting option has to be considered in important reckon. except this promoter is not a main option to choosing the school.So we set out it in 4th. And in the aspects of subcriteria, we specify that of dual degree can be considered more heavily than of remote professor. So, we tie down large weight down performer to of dual degree than of abroad professor. instruction ( schooling / access Fee) In financial situation of applicants, tuition of MBA course is very expensive. So, it can be a main calculate of choosing the school. But it isnt deserved to graze upper than contest ratio. So, we rank it in second. Furthermore, in the aspects of subcriter ia, we think that tuition can be considered more heavily than price of admission bung.Because admission fee have to be paid just one time when the applicants enter the school. So, we attach big weighted factor to tuition than admission fee. plan ( of twits / of position bothers) When applicants select the school, curriculum is sombre factor that have to be concerned. But, as usual, each MBA course open the subject in similar. It fashion that it cant be a main factor. So, we rank it third. Furthermore, in the aspects of subcriteria, we think that of lecture can be considered more seriously than of slope lecture. Of course, in globalization is realized widely, side is needed some(prenominal) we do.But, diversity of subjects can be considered more important than of English lectures. So, we attach bigger weighted factor to of lecture than of English lecture. So, we rank the each criteria subcriteria same(p) be (Scoring) Criteria Subcriteria 1st disceptation ratio No subcriteria second reading 1st Tuition 2nd ingress Fee 3rd computer programme 1st of Lecture 2nd of English Lecture 4th financial support 1st of dual degree 2nd of immaterial professor ? Collecting the grassroots data of criteria subcriteria 1. contender ratioUniversity Categories of Recruitment of applicator of Successful candidate Competitiveness ratio Yonsei corporal MBA 128 502 128 3. 9 1 Korea Korea MBA 187 920 187 4. 9 1 SKK Asia MBA 18 39 23 2. 2 1 Sogang SIMBA 60 127 42 2. 1 1 *Seoul University didnt recruit the student in 2012. So, it is excluded. 2. Supporting ( of foreign professor / of dual degree with graduated school) University Categories of foreign professor of dual degree Yonsei unified MBA 9 2 Korea Korea MBA 14 3 SKK Asia MBA 39 4 Sogang SIMBA 2 5 3.Tuition (Tuition / adit Fee, unit ) University Categories Tuition Admission Fee Yonsei Corporate MBA 4000 cxx Korea Korea MBA 4200 120 SKK Asia MBA 5000 100 Sogang SIMBA 3700 cx 4. Curriculum ( of Lecture / English Lecture) University Categories of Lecture of English Lecture Yonsei Corporate MBA 50 6 Korea Korea MBA 35 13 SKK Asia MBA 12 12 Sogang SIMBA 24 20 ? Applying AHP to choose a final model So, we fixate the weighted factors like Weighted factor of criteria Weighted factor of subcriteria Competition ratio 0. 360 No subcriteria Supporting 0. 55 of foreign professor 0. 303 of dual degree 0. 697 Tuition 0. 265 Tuition 0. 909 Admission Fee 0. 091 Curriculum 0. 220 of Lecture 0. 602 of English Lecture 0. 398 4. word By using a AHP method, we can get a objective information which can make for us a wise decision in selecting the MBA school. Of course, it provides the confirm standard in making a choice. But applicants perceptiveness can blend over that data. Furthermore, applicants specifications are different. So, choice is depending on own their decision. The AHP method is the only hawkshaw that can provide the objective data.