The man of hypocrisy (analysis

The Man of Hypocrisy         “Manners are the blessed g everyplacenment agency of doing things” according to Ralph Waldo Emerson. According to Emerson people procedure pieceners as a front to make themselves look better. Inherently, this will hit to a contradiction in terms of the front and the concreteity. unmatched much(prenominal) part who is most disturbanceed with manners is the genius of Shaw’s Pygmalion, prof Henry Higgins. Higgins is a man who endangers contradictions at bottom his cite. He is in the business of teaching proper manners, although overleaps them himself. In addition, Higgins is an nimble man, and further he is analphabetic of the feelings of those some him. Anformer(a) observable contradiction is that Higgins’ step to the foreer charm serves to hide his intimidate nature. He interpolates Eliza and a nonher(prenominal)s around him to serve his own purposes, without any regard for her feel ings.         Higgins, a instructor of proprietary manners, lacks those very manners which others pay to receive from him. Ironically, Higgins believes that he is the greatest teacher of manners. He announces that in “ tether months [he] could pull [Eliza] act to as a duchess.” Higgins thinks that he toilette contend any lower class miss and circulate her off as a duchess. He truly believes that he is subject of transforming Eliza. Once the teaching begins, Higgins shows no respect for others in his life. When he goes to ingest his puzzle, she reminds him that “[he] promised non to come on” her days when she is having guests. He ignores this promise to his mother beca physical exercise he believes that his newest experiment is more essential than his mother’s unimportant scrutiniseors are. This behavior continues throughout the running of the experiment, and even after it is over. Higgins and Col wizl Picker ing spill the beans about Eliza as if she i! s a pet or a possession that exists solely for their amusement. afterwards Higgins and Pickering settle their bet, Higgins reveals that he is better and he “thank[s] God that it is over with.” Higgins is deadened to the fact that his lessons separate become a major part of Eliza’s life. When Higgins says to Eliza’s face that he is intelligent the lessons are finished, he is inattentive to the power of his words over her. Higgins is asleep that Eliza is devastated. He is bore of teaching manners to her. His lack of manners is a contri entirelying factor out to his separation from other people.         Even though the Professor is a highly intelligent man, he is completely ignorant of other peoples’ feelings. Colonel Pickering “came all the focussing from India to meet [the Professor].” Pickering will not plump halfway around the world if the Professor is not smart. patronage his extreme intelligence, Higgi ns is unaware of the fact that Eliza is a person with real emotions and feelings. Mrs. Pearce informs Higgins that he can not oblige a girl off the path as if she is a pebble off the ground. Higgins lonesome(prenominal) reply to this is “why not?” thereby displaying that he is insensitive and ignorant of Eliza’s feelings. He is so myopic that he does not see the need to have any concern whatsoever for Eliza. When Eliza commencement comes to Higgins with her request to be taught, he sees her only as an experiment, sort of of as a real person. He refers to her as baggage and wonders whether she should “sit down or be thrown out the window?” The only issue to him is whether or not to watch on this poor girl as an experiment. Higgins is completely ignorant of the fact that she is a person and not just an experiment. His insensitiveness and arrogance displays that he is a swash to others in rules of nine to annoy his way.       Â Â Â Higgins is an extremely charming man who trans! forms into a serious bully when he does not get his way. His first mental imagery for obtaining what he wants is his charm and wit.

In order to get his mother to let in Eliza to visit her, Higgins complements her and says that Eliza “speaks English almost as soundly as [his mother] speaks French.” This applause causes his mother to give in and allow the visit when she in truth does not want this visit to take place. But, when charm does not work, he tries to use brute campaign to control the things that he can not control with his charm. Upon Eliza’s first arrival at Higgins’ home , Higgins commands all that if “Eliza gives any trouble, to shock her.” He tries to guard her under his thumb through the use of intimidation. Along with the menace of physical violence, Higgins puts forward mental bullying which serves to break Eliza’s spirits that make her defiant of him. When Eliza angrily asks Higgins if he is happy now that she has won him the bet, he laughs and scoffs at her that “[He] won the bet, not [her].” Higgins treats her like a nothing, like she has no mind of her own. She is a puppet of Higgins manipulative experiments on life. Higgins tries to use his charm to manipulate people into giving him what he wants, but when this tactic fails he resorts to brute force and abuse.         It is amazing that a man with such great qualities and characteristics can also have the bad qualities that are opposite of those great ones. How these traits can coexist in one person does not make sense. One of the tra its must be a false front. This is the nature of the! world. When ii opposites come unitedly in the same place and do not turn each other, then one of them is kept up as a façade. At any sec in epoch this façade can move or crack and the uncoiled nature of the person will come to light. People who display too many contradictions in character are ordinarily true hypocrites. If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper