I have decided to do my paper on the Saints bounty scandal. This issue offers galore(postnominal) opportunities to discuss ethics. The alleged actions of the football game game players atomic number 18 on many levels unethical. To intentionally shock someone, for pecuniary gain, is unethical. I dont think many would betoken that, but the question then becomes to what extent was that truly the theatrical role? This question brings us to the trial member and here we lift another ethical dilemma. The commissioner of the league, Rodger Goodell, who has overseen the trial, and sentencing, is also the label for the appeal process. This complicates things in more ways than one. Is he an straightforward judge, and if he isnt is that ethical? Is it fair that the accused are being move twice by the same psyche? Well apparently, middle(a) through the appeal hearings, that is deemed the situation, and now the commissioner has removed himself and found someone else, an improve ment, yes, but is it ethical? In my opinion, No.
The commissioner should not have the furbish up power to oversee, or govern who oversees, these showcases of situations. It is a very alter issue, which is easy to take sides on. It hits sibylline moral issues with most people, and it is tall(prenominal) to sway someone who has their mind make on this type of situation. How are we the public to know whether or not the newly appointed judge is truly unbiased, or just a pawn of Goodell? http://aol.sportingnews.com/nfl/story/2012-10-19/saints-bounty-scandal-roger-goodell-recuse-punishment-evidence-jonathan-vilma?icid=maing- grid7%7Cmaing9%7Cdl7%7Csec1_lnk3%26pLid%3D22! 2779If you want to welcome a full essay, order it on our website:
OrderCustomPaper.comIf you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment