Culture links us to places and peoples in a variety of courses. These emblematical links can include religion, computer games, costume, food, or the media. The media, as well as symbolising specific national cultures, is likewise a vehicle for advertising different cultures around the world. It could be argued that, because of increasing interpenetration, which is distant cultures...com[ing] face to face with each other at a local level...(Cochrane, A., Pain, K., 2004, p.16), national cultures be becoming thin out and homogenised into one huge global culture, so I result be answering the question of whether national cultures are still important. The globalization of culture is just one way globalisation manifests itself. It can be summarised as a crush that encompasses all areas of our lives, economically, politically and culturally. It is the organisation and exercise of power on a global scale (Cochrane, A., Pain, K., 2004, p.15). I will examine the globalisation of culture from three perspectives, that of the globalists, the transformationalists and the inter-nationalists. Globalists believe that globalisation is irreversible and will bring huge benefits to mankind, but the pessimistic globalists believe it is pitch greater inequality. Cultural imperialism is a key concept in their argument, and is the domination by the powerful western world oer the weaker countries of the developing world.
Inter-nationalists disagree with the views of the positive globalists, but take rough of the pessimistic arguments on board. They argue that todays flows of trade and culture are just a continuum of historical flows, and are more regional than global. The transformationalists see both sides, arguing that the globalists are exaggerating their case, that nation states agree much of their power but that some of it has been reshaped to fit in with the continually growing global infrastructure. I will be arguing the case for the...
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment