KARL POPPER-"great living philosopher of science"

The point was that if all states of an fight fit in with a hypothesis, then there is no state of affair or observation or data-based result that can be claimed as supporting separate for it. Since there is non an observable difference between its universe true or false, there is no scientific instruction (O'Hear, 1980; Magee, 1973).

Popper's main contribution to the philosophy of scientific discipline was his rejection of the empirical science inductive method. The inductive method stated that a scientific hypothesis is tested and verified with the obtaining of repeated outcomes of substantiating observations. Popper's theory of misrepresentation stated that a scientist should seek to find an sight exception to the postulated rule and the absence of this contradictory evidence becomes the proofread of his theory. In this way the hypothesis is deductively validated by falsifi office criterion.

Theories of the sidereal day included those of Freud and Adler, who explained everything with no conceivable observations that could contradict them. Popper saw this ability to explain everything, although appealing, as being what was most wrong with them. The ability to know everything would result in a sense of talented mastery and an emotional sense of security. Acceptance of one of these theories take to the confirming of instances everywhere (Magee, 1973).

Freudian analysts stated that their theories were verifie

O'Hear, A. (1980). Karl Popper. London: Routledge.

Logical positivists of the times attempted to part between metaphysical verbiage and statements which said something. They arrived at the inference that there were cardinal kinds of significant propositions. Statements in logic and math were true or false without reference to experience and statements which were not a formal mathematics of logic proposition and were not empirically verifiable must be meaningless. Verifiability became the criterion of seam between what was meaningful and meaningless (Magee, 1973).

Schilpp, P. A. (Ed.) (1974). The philosophy of Karl Popper. La Salle, IL: Open Court.

Popper's concept can be viewed in a particular situation in psychology such as stating that lower rank complexes cause aggressive behavior. This theory could be erroneously supported with the biased and discover correlation between the two variables (inferiority and aggression). Wittgenstein would point out that this would be an attempt for generality to subvert behavior to one law. According to Popper this would be an example of pseudo-science. originator would attempt to prove the theory by specifying in earn what would disprove it. For Popper proof that inferiority causes aggression would not be confirmed by compiling biased examples of this phenomenon. The theory would involve to be deductively validated by the falsifiability criterion or an observed exception to the theory; contradictory evidence would prove the theory. Popper's falsification theory would help eliminate the erroneous conclusion that inferiority is the cause of aggression. However, the compiling of observed situations where inferiority did result in aggression would assist in the future development of a theory regarding these variables.

d by clinical observations. Adler confirmed his theories with face-to-face experience. Popper believed that these theories may in fact be correct and of massive
Ordercustompaper.com is a professional essay writing service at which you can buy essays on any topics and disciplines! All custom essays are written by professional writers!