?Tonight friends our great country has voted for a change, and Canadians bear asked our party to take the lead and delivering that change. We allow honor your trust; we will deliver on our commitment.? These are the opening words of our twenty-second Prime Minister of Canada acceptance speech. On January 23, 2006 Canadians voted for the Conservatives fellowship to be in forefinger lead by Stephen Harper. The dynasty of the Liberal Party has crashed and burn after twelve years in power because of the anger put in by Canadians over the sponsorship scandal recently. This is what Canadians voted for, is to have a change in government and a draw that stands up for Canada or is it? Do Canadians want to see a new electoral transcription used in the federal official elections or to stick with the Single-Member Plurality that Canada is currently using? Which body is going to bring out the most voters and young voters and repeat them into seats that the voters want to see in the House of putting green?The Canadian electoral system foundation is based on the United Kingdom system and how they use it. The current system which was used for the 2006 elections where Stephen Harper won is entitle the ?single-member large number? or ?first-past-the-post? system or as Paul Prosperi call it ? master takes all system.
? The system is simple not complex and that makes it blue-blooded for Canadians to understand. There is no loop hole or difficulties with the single-member coterie system. It is straight forward, one view from each constituency with the most votes accumulated by the end of the day wins inthat riding. The goal is to attain plurality is based on the translation of votes into seat. Canadians would argue that what if one candidate out beats the other candidate not...
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment